The
movie is making waves in theatres and everyone are all praise for it. Including
ordinary cinegoers and reviewers. And justly so… its pure class.. script
written by the director Jithin K. Jose in collaboration with Jishnu Sreekumar,
technical side, Faisal Ali’s camera, BGM and scores… plus, masterclass performance
from all the actors, especially, the leading duo of Mammootty and Vinayakan. This
one is definitely going to be remembered in the annals of Malayalam cinema history
as a class apart.
The
scripting had a huge challenge before it: to treat the bulk of a horrendous
case, the details of which are in the public domain, with a sharp eye on
characterization, and without losing the grip over the audience, and it was
further complicated by the logistics of movie making: to present the greatest
ever Malayalam actor as an arch-villain without celebrating evil… no small feat
that the script and direction has achieved with elan… the way the script has done
away with needless ‘back-story’ building and excuses for the demon’s moral
entropy was really fresh in Malayalam cinema, something not even masters like
M.T. didn’t dream of doing (recall ‘Uyarangalil’ (1984)
by I.V.Sasi, for instance).
But
yet, some have raised objections, and most of them are for the very wrong
reasons that the movie never warrants…
The
‘one-time watchable’ narratives hinged on how the script lacked
unpredictability… I think this is unwarranted: for two reasons. Basically, ‘one-time
watchable’ thesis applies to plot-driven movies where the question is always ‘what
next’ or ‘how the tension would mount’. In a character-driven or theme-driven
story, it’s the opposite… its rather a slow-burn process and doesn’t care for sudden
thrills of adrenaline rise. Again, when the movie is about known, public-domain
stories/ incidents/ characters, ‘what next’ has nothing to do with the script.
Its rather about how layered the characterisation/s is/are, how performative
the roles are, and how thematic layers are revealed. I think the film has done
well, keeping the necessary mystery elements and avoiding spoon-feeding at the
same time. The heartiest example for this subtility can be seen in the clues
about the genesis of the S.I.’s metamorphosis as ‘owl’, his nick-name.
Kalamkaval’
does it all fine.
Another
objection was from some generally sensitive viewers who found fault with Vinayakan’s
performance and languid and exhausted,
lacking the dynamic personality that the character demaded.
I
think these critics miss out the very essence of that character.
That
seeming vulnerability and lack of heroic bravado are the very essence of that
character. He is no movie-version cop of that alpha male type. Rather, he is a
quite ordinary, plain, police officer with is own insecurities and anxieties. But
beneath the veneer of such fragilities, he is what his second name is – the owl
who abides his time and, when it presents itself, doesn’t budge. His strength
is not ‘spectacle’, but real, rooted and interiorised.
And
Vinayakan was just perfect with his new avatar.
Among
the female leads only a few had screen spaces to impress enough on the
audience, though none were just decorations, but maybe it would take a second
watching to fully grasp their contributions. Of them, Gayathri Arun, with her
sensitive face and fragility, did carry her role with elan. So were Shruthi
Ramchandran with the trusted abandon of a devoted lover, Rajisha Vijayan with
her wounds craving burial, Nisa with the hard-earned self-assurance of a struggling
daily-bread-winner, Dhanya Ananya with the expectant anticipation of the beguiled,
naive one, ... among others.
Gibin
Gopinath and Azeez Nedumangad do it again with their nice performances. Biju
Pappan too had a good job to do and did it fine.
Mujeeb
Majeed made sure that his music didn’t stand ‘out’ but did what it was expected
to do.. to carry the movie through, with tempo, cadence and silences as it
demanded. On an impish note, yes, the Ilyaraja echoes were indeed brilliant and…
timely…
Some
say the cat-and-mouse game in the second half could be a bit more protracted
for impact… of this, I am not sure but not sure either way… However, the movie
is already of decent length with its 144 minutes run time.
And I do think that the man, the 'Owl', has had his own
share of 'cat-and-mouse' inwardly, that is, within himself, before catching up
with Stanely in that final showdown.
This is a movie experience one cannot afford to miss… It’s the paradox of art that despicable predators can find their way to excellent screen avatars… It’s the paradox of art that despicable predators can find their way to excellent screen avatars…
No comments:
Post a Comment